|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/7] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() |
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:44 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:08 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:10 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > > I did this , just take it ;) > > > > Do we have to pass gfp to ->ndo_netpoll_setup() too? It seems no, so far > > I don't think we have to do that. > > > > Thanks. > > > > It is needed. > > ->ndo_netpoll_setup() is called from __netpoll_setup() > > So it would make no sense to allow GFP_KERNEL allocations in > ndo_netpoll_setup() hgandlers if we called __netpoll_setup() with > GFP_ATOMIC gfp > I see your point. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |