Re: [PATCH 12/16] ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info in struct rtable again.

[Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@xxxxxxx>]

On 2012/07/10 08:07, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Maintaining this in the inetpeer entries was not the right way to do
> this at all.
> 

This patch makes it possible to have the same address assigned to a tunnel
interface and its lower device, whereas previously that would lead to mtu
problems because both routes shared the same pmtu info in the inet_peer.

ex: gre1 192.168.1.2/32 over eth0 192.168.1.2/24

Is such a wicked configuration supported?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html