|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] tcp: TCP Small Queues |
>> Considering these two points, why TSQ over the Codel feedback >> approach? > > I dont think they compete. They are in fact complementary. > > If you use codel/fq_codel + TSQ, you have both per flow limitation in > qdisc (TSQ) + sojourn time aware and multi flow aware feedback. Makes sense. My conjecture is when using codel/fq_codel qdisc, the need for TSQ will diminish. But as you said... good part of TSQ is it limits per-flow queuing for any qdisc structure, even those not using codel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |