Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] tcp: TCP Small Queues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

>> Considering these two points, why TSQ over the Codel feedback
>> approach?
>
> I dont think they compete. They are in fact complementary.
>
> If you use codel/fq_codel + TSQ, you have both per flow limitation in
> qdisc (TSQ) + sojourn time aware and multi flow aware feedback.

Makes sense. My conjecture is when using codel/fq_codel qdisc, the
need for TSQ will diminish. But as you said... good part of TSQ is it
limits per-flow queuing for any qdisc structure, even those not using
codel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux