On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 13:12 -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/166737/ > > Yes, the patches in this series were generated as patches against the > "net" tree (sorry for not indicating that). > > The dst leak on the v6 sysctl_tw_recycle code path (patches 2-5) seems > like a pretty low priority, so I think we could simplify your plan > even a little further... How about this as a plan: we could apply the > first patch in the series (tcp: heed result of > security_inet_conn_request() in tcp_v6_conn_request()) to the net tree > now, and skip patches 2-5 for now. Once your pending synack work is in > net-next, I can respin patches 2-5 for net-next. How does that sound? > It sounds good, thanks ! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html