Re: [PATCH 0/8] dcbnl: Major simplifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:06:20AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 6/14/2012 12:54 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:55:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >>Lots of deleted code, I like it :-)
> >>
> >>Applied, but could you send a follow-on patch to use BUG_ON() instead
> >>of that "if (!ptr) { /* ... */ BUG(); }" construct?
> >
> >Sure, I must have had a weak moment right there :)
> >
> 
> Nice! I'm a bit late but dumped this into my dcbnl netlink test kit
> and everything looks good so...

Thank you for testing John. Are you referring to lldp/test/nltest.c?
I only discovered it after you mentioned a test kit. I've been feeding
a list of commands through dcbtool for testing so far.

BTW, I believe you mentioned at some point, that there is a patch
available allowing non net_device based DCB users to use dcbnl.
Otherwise I would start with the effort :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux