|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/8] dcbnl: Major simplifications |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:06:20AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 6/14/2012 12:54 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:55:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >>Lots of deleted code, I like it :-)
> >>
> >>Applied, but could you send a follow-on patch to use BUG_ON() instead
> >>of that "if (!ptr) { /* ... */ BUG(); }" construct?
> >
> >Sure, I must have had a weak moment right there :)
> >
>
> Nice! I'm a bit late but dumped this into my dcbnl netlink test kit
> and everything looks good so...
Thank you for testing John. Are you referring to lldp/test/nltest.c?
I only discovered it after you mentioned a test kit. I've been feeding
a list of commands through dcbtool for testing so far.
BTW, I believe you mentioned at some point, that there is a patch
available allowing non net_device based DCB users to use dcbnl.
Otherwise I would start with the effort :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |