Re: Regression on TX throughput when using bonding

[Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>]

On 06/14/2012 08:43 AM, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> As suggested by Eric, here is a description I wish to be as precise as possible.
> I send three RAW video frames, 1920x1088@30fps on three udp sockets to
> the same NIC.
> Each sending is in a thread, so I will focus on the numbers for one thread.
>
> This generates burst of send(), as this : each 1/30s send 3.133.440
> bytes to the ethernet interface.
> This is in fact something similar to this :
> while (n != 0)
> {
>    sendto(socket, packet, 4000);
>    n -= 4000;
>    packet += 4000
> }
>
> My interface is a bond with a 10Gbps interface and MTU set to 4096.
> This means I have 784 packets each 1/30s which are sent on my
> interface by one thread, then I wait for the next burst, and so on.
> The videos are not necessarily the same video, so the threads may send
> simultaneously or not...
>
> My socket is in blocking mode.

If desired, here is how to simulate that with netperf:

./configure --enable-intervals
make

And an example over loopback:

raj@tardy:~/netperf2_trunk$ src/netperf -l 10 -t UDP_STREAM -H localhost 
-w 33 -b 783 -- -s 1M -S 1M -m 4000
MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from ::0 (::) port 0 AF_INET6 to tardy (::1) 
port 0 AF_INET6 : interval
Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages
Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec

2097152    4000   9.99       260739      0     835.18
2097152           9.99       260442            834.23


Adjust the -s and/or -S options to match what Jean-Michel's application 
uses for socket buffer sizes.  Run another two simultaneous instances to 
get the three streams.  Adjust the run length with the -l option.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html