Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Faster/parallel SYN handling to mitigate SYN floods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 14:51 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 00:40 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > That seems like a very unlikely situation, which we perhaps should
> > neglect as we are under SYN attack.
> >
> > I will test the attack vector, if we instead of dropping the reqsk,
> > fall back into the slow locked path.
> 
> I can provoke this attack vector, and performance is worse, if not
> dropping the reqsk early.
> 
> Generator SYN flood at 750Kpps, sending false retransmits mixture.
> 
> - With early drop: 406 Kpps
> - With return to locked processing: 251 Kpps
> 
> Its still better than the approx 150Kpps, without any patches.
> 

How many different IP addresses are used by your generator ?

Or maybe you disabled IP route cache ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux