|
|
Re: [PATCH] ipv4: fix the rcu race between free_fib_info and ip_route_output_slow |
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 07:02 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 12:54 +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote: > > > > fi->fib_dev (aka fib_nh[0].nh_dev) need full RCU protection. > > The new patch posted at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/22/558 does move the > > resetting to RCU protection. > > Its not enough. > > We must take care that all users are in a RCU protected region. > > They might be already, but a full check is needed. > > For example > > net/ipv4/fib_trie.c:2563: fi->fib_dev ? fi->fib_dev->name : "*" > > looks to be safe (because already in a rcu_read_lock()) > > But its not. > > Right thing would be to do : > > struct net_device *ndev = rcu_dereference(fi->fib_dev) > > ... > ndev ? ndev->name : "*" Thanks for the pointer. Besides fi->fib_dev here, we need check fi->fib_hash, fi->fib_lhash, and nexthop_nh->nh_hash. Yanmin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |