|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: experimental zero copy tx support |
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 21:39 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hello Mike, > > > > Have you tested this patch? I think the difference between macvtap > and > > tap is tap forwarding the packet to bridge. The zerocopy is disabled > in > > this case. > > > > Shirley > > Testing in progress, but the patchset I pointed to enables > zerocopy with bridge. Hello Mike, You meant this patch or another patchset for enabling bridge zerocopy? I remembered we disabled forward skb zerocopy since the user space program might hold the buffers too long or forever. In tap/bridge case, when the tx buffers will be released? Thanks Shirley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |