|
|
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] netfilter: don't assume NFPROTO_* are like PF_* |
Le Mon, 14 May 2012 17:09:54 +0200 (CEST),
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> On Monday 2012-05-14 15:58, Alban Crequy wrote:
> >--- a/include/linux/netfilter.h
> >+++ b/include/linux/netfilter.h
> >@@ -62,11 +62,11 @@ enum nf_inet_hooks {
> >
> > enum {
> > NFPROTO_UNSPEC = 0,
> >- NFPROTO_IPV4 = 2,
> >- NFPROTO_ARP = 3,
> >- NFPROTO_BRIDGE = 7,
> >- NFPROTO_IPV6 = 10,
> >- NFPROTO_DECNET = 12,
> >+ NFPROTO_IPV4,
> >+ NFPROTO_ARP,
> >+ NFPROTO_BRIDGE,
> >+ NFPROTO_IPV6,
> >+ NFPROTO_DECNET,
> > NFPROTO_NUMPROTO,
> > };
>
> This must not be changed under any circumstances. It is exported to
> and used by userspace. (Except perhaps for NFPROTO_DECNET, which
> refers to a quite dead protocol that I think no user parts have ever
> used NFPROTO_DECNET.) I would consider it acceptable to change the
> value for NFPROTO_DECNET if Pablo joins.
Thanks for the review. I didn't realize it was exported to and used by
userspace. I would drop this patch then.
Alban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |