|
|
Re: [PATCH] net: compare_ether_addr[_64bits]() has no ordering |
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 02:26 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 07:25:44 +0200 > > > I suppose I could fix those first and then later change the type, but I > > think having a "compare_ether_addr" function that returns *false* when > > they *match* would be rather confusing. I'd rather have > > "equal_ether_addr()" that returns *true* when they match. > > > > I guess we could introduce equal_ether_addr() though and slowly convert, > > keeping compare_ether_addr() as a sort of wrapper around it. > > Indeed, this is one way to proceed. perhaps is_equal_ether_addr or is_same_ether_addr instead? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |