Re: [PATCH] net: compare_ether_addr[_64bits]() has no ordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 02:26 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 07:25:44 +0200
> 
> > I suppose I could fix those first and then later change the type, but I
> > think having a "compare_ether_addr" function that returns *false* when
> > they *match* would be rather confusing. I'd rather have
> > "equal_ether_addr()" that returns *true* when they match.
> > 
> > I guess we could introduce equal_ether_addr() though and slowly convert,
> > keeping compare_ether_addr() as a sort of wrapper around it.
> 
> Indeed, this is one way to proceed.

perhaps is_equal_ether_addr or is_same_ether_addr instead?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux