|
|
Re: [PATCH] bridge: make brctl showstp display port id |
On Tue, 1 May 2012 19:47:33 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 2012/05/01 19:39:55:
> >
> > > Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 2012/04/30 18:07:47:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:39:08 +0200
> > > > Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My brctl showstp br0 always shows a 0 port id:
> > > > > eth2 (1)
> > > > > port id 0 state disabled
> > > > > designated root 8000.00069c00b2fb path cost 100
> > > > >
> > > > > because port id is printed as a hex number in sys fs. Change the
> > > > > two hex occurrences(port no and port id) to decimal, just like all
> > > > > the other numbers in this area.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> > > > > index fd5799c..9c4c2eb 100644
> > > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> > > > > @@ -86,13 +86,13 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(designated_cost, S_IRUGO, show_designated_cost, NULL);
> > > > >
> > > > > static ssize_t show_port_id(struct net_bridge_port *p, char *buf)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", p->port_id);
> > > > > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", p->port_id);
> > > > > }
> > > > > static BRPORT_ATTR(port_id, S_IRUGO, show_port_id, NULL);
> > > > >
> > > > > static ssize_t show_port_no(struct net_bridge_port *p, char *buf)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", p->port_no);
> > > > > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", p->port_no);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > static BRPORT_ATTR(port_no, S_IRUGO, show_port_no, NULL);
> > > >
> > > > No. This would be a visible change to applications.
> > > > The bridge utilities should be fixed instead.
> > >
> > > Well, my reasoning was that if not the native tools got this right, what are the
> > > chances that other apps got it right? I don't know any other apps than
> > > brctl using this info, do you? We could check one or two apps to see what they do.
> > >
> > > Jocke
> > >
> >
> > Current bridge-utils does not have the issue. It has been fixed
> > for 5 years. The problem was fixed by:
> >
> > commit 0397c6aa48769505e6aa4481f0786c8f4eaaf890
> > Author: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue May 8 11:10:34 2007 -0700
> >
> > I've noticed for a while that
> >
> > output is showing 0 for port_no and port_id
> >
> > It seems that somewhere in 2.6 sysfs land the following items got
> > printed in hexadecimal, and brctl code was parsing for decimal only
> >
> > doug:/sys/class/net/eth0/brport# cat port_id
> > 0x8001
> > doug:/sys/class/net/eth0/brport# cat port_no
> > 0x1
>
>
> Yeah, just noticed that too. On our embedded board we have the release just before that fix :(
I couldnt help remembering...
Spock: I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |