Re: [PATCH] ks8851: Cancel any pending IRQ work

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/12/12 13:34, Matt Renzelmann wrote:
> I agree on all counts -- the patch is buggy, though it does at least "shrink"
> the window of vulnerability.  Frankly, I don't believe I'm qualified to write an
> appropriate patch for this driver, at least without spending considerably more
> time on it.
>
> FWIW, I found this problem with a new driver-testing tool we've developed called
> SymDrive, and my goal is primarily to determine if the bug is real or not.  The
> tool is imperfect and we are trying to validate its operation.

The bug is real if your interrupt controller is broken :-) One could
argue that it's outside the scope of this driver to handle broken
interrupt controllers or buggy genirq code, but being defensive sounds
like a good idea.

>
> That said, if there is an issue here, and we can come up with an appropriate
> fix, then I'd be happy to write a patch for it.
>

I'll see what I can do in the next few days about the deadlock I mentioned.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html