Re: net: more accurate skb truesize - regression on Microblaze

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 01:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > ll_temac allocates XTE_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE frames, even for MTU=1500 ?
> yes.
> >
> > Trying to allocate smaller packets would definitely help your tcp
> > receiver performance and overall reliability  (order-0 allocations
> > instead of order-2)
> There is long history for ll_temac and axi emac drivers. and if you compare
> them they are very similar with similar bugs.
> In our distribution we are using older ll_temac driver where this is fixed.
> Performance is much higher if you allocate buffers for actual mtu.
> Thanks,
> Michal
> P.S.: Our plan is to start to use mainline drivers and fixing them to get
> the same performance as we have with old one. It is one my todo list.

Ah good, because this 9000+pad versus 1500+pad allocation is way more
problematic than the (small) change on skb->truesize you bisected ;)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux