Re: [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: Simplify code by always using offset8 or offset32.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: Simplify code by always using offset8 or offset32.
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:56:17 -0700
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, oleg@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mcgrathr@xxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxx, eparis@xxxxxxxxxx, serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, djm@xxxxxxxxxxx, scarybeasts@xxxxxxxxx, pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, markus@xxxxxxxxxxxx, coreyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <cfb04c3fe59e421093f035c035c88b51.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl>

On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 22:33 +1100, Indan Zupancic wrote:

> And if the dev, len or data_len fields are really moved past the first
> 127 bytes the JIT code can be changed too. The JIT code already depends
> on some of struct sk_buff's field properties anyway.

Its seems you didnt understand, but I said NO to your patch.

This time I am really tired.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Will Drewry
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Indan Zupancic
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Indan Zupancic
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Indan Zupancic
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Indan Zupancic
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Indan Zupancic
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/13] sk_run_filter: add BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: Simplify code by always using offset8 or offset32.
  - From: Indan Zupancic
- Re: [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: Simplify code by always using offset8 or offset32.
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: Simplify code by always using offset8 or offset32.
  - From: Indan Zupancic

Prev by Date: Re: Per TCP session statistics
Next by Date: [PATCH] Fix pppol2tp getsockname()
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: Simplify code by always using offset8 or offset32.
Next by thread: netmap for linux now available
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]