Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix syncookie regression

[David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:37:31 -0700

> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:44 -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> 
>> Yes, exactly. 3.2.9 and 3.2.10 have
>> daef52bab1fd26e24e8e9578f8fb33ba1d0cb412 but not the
>> 4648dc97af9d496218a05353b0e442b3dfa6aaab that fixes the resulting
>> issue with sacked_out going negative, and these lines you've flagged
>> are exactly the symptoms we'd expect because of that. The fix is
>> queued up for the -stable series already, so it should be in 3.2.11, I
>> presume. The fix is already in 3.3-rc7.
> 
> 3.2.12 more probably, as 3.2.11 is a single build fix

The syncookie regression fix isn't even pushed to Linus's tree yet,
and once it's there it still needs to cook for a few more days before
I'm willing to sent it to -stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html