RE: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add some --strict coding style checks |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:09 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
> This appears to falsely complain about parenthesis alignment in
> conditional statements with multiple opening parentheses. For
> example, these will report a check condition:
>
> if (test_and_set_bit(nr,
> addr))
> baz();
>
> if (!(func_a(x) &&
> func_b(y)))
> baz();
>
> Assuming my stupid mailer will screw up the indentation above, the 'a'
> in addr in the first example is meant to be immediately below the 'n'
> in nr, and the two 'f's in func_* are meant to be vertically lined up
> in the second example.
You're right, thanks for testing.
The logic I used is too trivial.
Andrew, please ditch this one for awhile.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless Networking]
[Linux Bluetooth Networking]
[Linux Networking Users]
[VLAN]
[Git]
[IETF Annouce]
[Linux Assembly]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Singles Social Networking]
[Yosemite Information]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux Kernel]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Virtualization]
[Linux Security]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Free Dating]