Re: [PATCH 1/2] r8169: Rx FIFO overflow fixes.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> :
> What do you think?  Is there any way I can help?  (E.g., given rough
> guidelines about what approach is acceptable I'd be happy to work with
> Gerd to produce a tested patch that does (1) and (2) but not (3) for
> 3.0.y.)

Few guidelines are needed: go for it.

I would trust the manufacturer for (3) though.

If you still have time to help, you should really try to break davem-next
branch. I won't claim it's bug-free but the IRQ / napi / Tx processing in
the r8169 driver should now be easier to read and maintain.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux