[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> probing simply fails on my machine,
>
> [ 882.064120] bcma: Failed to get SPROM: -71
> [ 882.064256] bcma-pci-bridge: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -2
>
> resulting in no wireless. Since the bcma SPROM setup allegedly is
> unused, simply ignoring the error with this hack
I personally hit the "No SPROM available" case, which is apparently
why it works for me.
That said, I obviously agree with your patch: if we don't fail for the
"No SPROM available" case, then we damn well shouldn't fail just
because it *is* available but we can't read it or whatever.
So Ack on the patch from me, but it should go through the network
guys. Arend, John?
Linus
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/main.c b/drivers/bcma/main.c
> index febbc0a..cb69fb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ int bcma_bus_register(struct bcma_bus *bus)
> pr_err("No SPROM available\n");
> } else if (err) {
> pr_err("Failed to get SPROM: %d\n", err);
> - return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> /* Register found cores */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless Networking]
[Linux Bluetooth Networking]
[Linux Networking Users]
[VLAN]
[Git]
[IETF Annouce]
[Linux Assembly]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Singles Social Networking]
[Yosemite Information]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux Kernel]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Virtualization]
[Linux Security]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Free Dating]