Re: [PATCH V3 10/14] ARM: mxs: add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/14] ARM: mxs: add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare
- From: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:56:34 +0800
- Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <eric.miao@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>, <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <201112192321.41560.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/timer.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c
> > index 20ec3bd..9760a12 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/system.c
> > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int __init mxs_arch_reset_init(void)
> >
> > clk = clk_get_sys("rtc", NULL);
> > if (!IS_ERR(clk))
> > - clk_enable(clk);
> > + clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/timer.c
> > index cace0d2..564a632 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/timer.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/timer.c
> > @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int __init mxs_clocksource_init(struct clk
> > *timer_clk)
> >
> > void __init mxs_timer_init(struct clk *timer_clk, int irq)
> > {
> > - clk_enable(timer_clk);
> > + clk_prepare_enable(timer_clk);
> >
> > /*
> > * Initialize timers to a known state
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I just came across this, will this also help solve the mxs problem with mutex
> lock begin done in atomic context in clk_enable/disable()?
No, It's for converting to generic clock framwork.
You can look at Mike's generic clock patches. clk_hw_ops.enable/disable
definitely can not sleep.
On register side, there' two way to protect register:
- use a global spin lock
- only use spin lock wherever gate register share the same one with
other non-gate register.
Thanks
Richard
>
> M
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless Networking]
[Linux Bluetooth Networking]
[Linux Networking Users]
[VLAN]
[Git]
[IETF Annouce]
[Linux Assembly]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Singles Social Networking]
[Yosemite Information]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux Kernel]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Virtualization]
[Linux Security]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Free Dating]