[SECURITY] CAN info leak/minor heap overflow |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
In bcm_connect() (in net/can/bcm.c), I noticed the following code:
sprintf(bo->procname, "%p", sock);
"procname" is a 9-byte char array. This code is wrong on two levels.
First, leaking a kernel address via a /proc filename is bad. Secondly,
on 64-bit platforms, up to 17 bytes may be copied into the buffer.
Fortunately, structure padding will most likely prevent this from being
a problem, except for the trailing NULL byte, which may overwrite the
first byte of the next heap object. Please name your procfile in a way
that doesn't leak information and fits into the desired name buffer.
-Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless Networking]
[Linux Bluetooth Networking]
[Linux Networking Users]
[VLAN]
[Git]
[IETF Annouce]
[Linux Assembly]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Singles Social Networking]
[Yosemite Information]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux Kernel]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Virtualization]
[Linux Security]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Free Dating]