Re: [PATCH] mips: set ST0_MX flag for MDMX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Hi Matt,

> As the comment in commit 3301edcb says, DSP and MDMX share the same
> config flag bit.
> 
> Without this set, MDMX instructions cause Illegal instruction errors.

 NAK, it's all pretty and nice, but I am afraid you're missing the point 
with your change.  The bit has its purpose, the MDMX accumulator has to be 
saved and restored -- just as the DSP or the FPU context -- between task 
switches and the bit provides for doing that lazily (of course you can do 
that eagerly instead if you like).

> Is MDMX implemented by anything other than some Broadcom CPUs? Is it
> totally replaced by DSP?

 You can have both ASEs on a single processor and they serve different 
purposes as far as I can tell.  I think NEC had an implementation as well, 
but it could have been an older revision than Broadcom's.

> I had a terrible time finding any documentation on it (which is annoying
> because Volume IV-b covering MDMX is referenced by all the MIPS64 documents.)
> but finally found a copy here: www.enlight.ru/docs/cpu/risc/mips/MDMXspec.pdf

 That's the old spec, back from SGI days, using the COP2 opcode space.  
It may not have been implemented and is certainly obsolete.  COP2 is 
available for user-defined coprocessors in the current architecture 
definition and MDMX instructions use different encodings (peek at 
libopcodes for details).

> If it's dead, it's too bad because it's a pretty cool ISA.

 I don't think MaDMaX is dead, it's still referred to from the 
architecture spec as of revision 3.12 and I am fairly sure you'll be able 
to implement it in your processor if you get the right architecture 
licences.

  Maciej



[Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

Add to Google Powered by Linux