Re: [PATCH 1/1] config: simplify INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


* Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/22/2012 03:25 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> >From: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Patch simplifies current INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK. compile tested on x86_64
> >
> >Change log:
> >get rid of INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK entirely replacing it with UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> >instead with the reverse meaning.
> >
> >whover wants to uninline the spinlocks (like spinlock debugging, paravirt etc
> >all just do select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> typo:
> Whoever wants to uninline the spinlocks (like spinlock debugging,
> paravirt etc) just do select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK.
> 
> >
> >Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >  Please refer : https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/21/357
> 
> Linus, Please let me know if this is what you were looking for or
> Did I really mess it up :(

Looks sane to me at first sight - will process it once the merge 
window calms down a bit.

Thanks,

	Ingo



[Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

Add to Google Powered by Linux