|
|
|
Re: [PATCH 9/9 v3] spi: add Broadcom BCM63xx SPI controller driver | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Florian Fainelli <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 21:19:22 Grant Likely wrote:
>> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops = {
>> > + .suspend = bcm63xx_spi_suspend,
>> > + .resume = bcm63xx_spi_resume,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +#define BCM63XX_SPI_PM_OPS (&bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops)
>> > +#else
>> > +#define BCM63XX_SPI_PM_OPS NULL
>>
>> A bit ugly. Do this instead in the else clause and drop the
>> BCM63XX_SPI_PM_OPS:
>>
>> #define bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops NULL
>
> This won't work, because driver.pm must be set to a pointer to a struct
> dev_pm_ops, that's why I used this trick to make it build fine in both cases.
> If I follow your advice, with driver.pm = &bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops, it won't build
> for CONFIG_PM=n.
Okay, fair enough.
g.
[Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Photo] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]
![]() |
![]() |