| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Please read Evan's correction on my summary. Thanks Evan :) > In general XFS seemed to be considered as a good choice. > LVM on the other hand received mixed reviews. > Some had good luck with it, others didn't. It was also pointed out that > LVM was not under "development" any more and was also not part of the > 2.5.x series Actually, LVM is under development and will be a part of 2.5, if it isn't already. LVM 1.x is not under development anymore, true, but 2.0 is quite active. I'm on the LVM development e-mail list, so I see quite a bit of what is going on. Thanks. _______________________________________________ LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org submissions: LinuxManagers@linuxmanagers.org subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers
[Home] [Kernel List] [Linux SCSI] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Admin] [Yosemite News] [Motherboards]