- Subject: Re: Reducing N900 RAM usage
- From: Jan Knutar <jknutar@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 04:07:00 +0200
- Authentication-results: smtp01.wmfi.net; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- Delivered-to: maemo-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAEH5T2O1z_Uz+MPHYZJjhX9G7wu8799=8tysErJs0d3GqPZ4ng@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.27.41-170.2.117.fc10.x86_64; KDE/4.3.3; x86_64; ; )
On Wednesday 07 March 2012, Paul Hartman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A freshly-flashed N900 is so much faster and more responsive compared
> to my N900 with all my favorite apps installed, mail accounts, MfE,
> chat accounts, themes, status bar widgets, and so on. I'm guessing
> these things all have a negative impact...
>
> Has anyone done a study into the impact of these various things and
> RAM usage? For example how much RAM can I spare if I don't use Modest
> at all, or don't use chat accounts, etc. allowing me to weigh the
> cost vs. benefit of using these features.
IIRC, Skype when I used it seemed to be about 5-10Meg impact on RSS.
In general, I'd imagine having any QT widgets would add 10-20M use. Not
so sure myself, I stopped using widgets entirely, not enough ram for
luxuries :)
_______________________________________________
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
[Nokia N800]
[Home]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Video Projectors]
[PDAs]
[Free Online Dating]
[Hacking TiVo]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Devices]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[N900 Unlocked]