On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:37:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Now that we've a common watchdog core, I would also like to convert the
> fschmd watchdog code to it (one of these days). Which raises the question
> through which tree should that conversion go in. fschmd is primarily a hwmon
> driver, but the changes will only touch the watchdog part...
>
> I guess it would be best to get the conversion in to Wim's tree, even though
> that slightly increases the chance of conflicts. The fschmd driver does not see
> a lot of churn, and I think Wim is a better reviewer for watchdog related
> patches :)
Chances of conflicts are so thin, I vote for getting it through Wim's
watchdog tree.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
[Video for Linux]
[Mplayer Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Singles Community]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Yosemite Backpacking]