Hello Jean,
Am Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, 18:02:34 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 17:55:25 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, 13:29:56 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > > @@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ Process Processor TjMax(C)
> > > N475/470/455/450 100
> > > N280/270 90
> > > 330/230 125
> > > + E680/660/640/620 90
> > > + E680T/660T/640T/620T 110
> > >
> > > 45nm Core2 Processors
> > > Solo ULV SU3500/3300 100
> >
> > Maybe it makes sense to state here explicitly that the 110 degree TjMax for the E6XXT series cannot be autodetected and the user should use tjmax module parameter.
>
> Same holds for many other models, unfortunately, but there's no reason
> to treat the E600T series differently.
Well, you can't treat them differently actually. But a hint why the detected tjmax might not match would be very helpfull.
Alexander
--
Dipl.-Inf. Alexander Stein
SYS TEC electronic GmbH
August-Bebel-Str. 29
D-07973 Greiz
Tel: +49-3661-6279-0, Fax: +49-3661-6279-99
eMail: Alexander.Stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Internet: http://www.systec-electronic.com
Managing Director: Dipl.-Phys. Siegmar Schmidt
Commercial registry: Amtsgericht Jena, HRB 205563
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
[Video for Linux]
[Mplayer Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Singles Community]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Yosemite Backpacking]