Re: [PATCH] x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:59:42 +0200 > Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended > and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'. > > In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse > was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01. > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx> Looks good to me, applied to net-next-2.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-x25" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html