Re: [PATCH] x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:59:42 +0200

> Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended
> and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'.
> 
> In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse
> was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me, applied to net-next-2.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-x25" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google Powered by Linux