On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 12:33 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote:
> Currently, ps mode is indicated per device (rather than
> per interface), which doesn't make a lot of sense.
>
> Moreover, there are subtle bugs caused by the inability
> to indicate ps change along with other changes
> (e.g. when the AP deauth us, we'd like to indicate
> CHANGED_PS | CHANGED_ASSOC, as changing PS before
> notifying about disassociation will result in null-packets
> being sent (if IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_PS) while
> the sta is already disconnected.)
>
> Keep the current per-device notifications, and add
> parallel per-vif notifications.
>
> In order to keep it simple, the per-device ps and
> the per-vif ps are orthogonal - the per-vif ps
> configuration is determined only by the user
> configuration (enable/disable) and the connection
> state, and is not affected by other vifs state and
> (temporary) dynamic_ps/offchannel operations
> (unlike per-device ps).
Applied, thanks.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[M2M Wireless]