On 06/10/2012 03:10 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 09:21 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> I dived into this and basically there is no correlation to the phy type.
>> There are chips with same 80211 core rev and different phy type as there
>> are chips with different 80211 core rev and the same phy type.
>>
>> Gr. AvS
>
> Hi Arend,
>
> Ok, then I will leave it based on the core rev like it is now. Are the
> values I added there for core rev 17 and 28 correct? They are just
> copied from the other phy-n device which has the same values set after
> powering up and before they are explicitly set. The core rev 17 device
> is working for me, but the core rev 28 is not, but I do not know why. I
> was unable to find these values in b43 or the spec b43 is based on.
>
> Hauke
>
Dug up the values and for corerev 17 they are fine, but corerev 28 has
different values:
{ 9, 58, 22, 14, 14, 5 }, /* corerev 28 */
Gr. AvS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[M2M Wireless]