Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
From: Michael Büsch <m@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 20:10:53 +0200
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andre Heider <a.heider@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, b43-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4FD239AA.9090708@lwfinger.net>

On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:43:06 -0500
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 06/08/2012 11:33 AM, Michael Büsch wrote:
> >
> > Larry, did you check with PIO?
> 
> No, I only used DMA. With the latest patch, compilation is Ok, and DMA works for 
> both kinds of firmware, while PIO fails for both.

Does PIO even work without that patch and with prop-firmware?

-- 
Greetings, Michael.

PGP encryption is encouraged / 908D8B0E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Larry Finger

References:
- chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Andre Heider
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Andre Heider
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Andre Heider
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Larry Finger
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Andre Heider
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Andre Heider
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Larry Finger
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Johannes Berg
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Michael Büsch
- Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
  - From: Larry Finger

Prev by Date: What's the differences between WPA_KEY_MGMT_NONE and WPA_KEY_MGMT_WPA_NONE?
Next by Date: Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
Previous by thread: Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
Next by thread: Re: chip id 4318 regression: WARN_ON_ONCE(sdata->vif.hw_queue[i] >= n_queues))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Linux Kernel] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources] [Free Dating] [M2M Wireless]