On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Lennert Buytenhek
<buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 09:12:25PM -0400, Pat Erley wrote:
>
>> >--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c
>> >@@ -5225,6 +5225,7 @@ static void mwl8k_finalize_join_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>> > }
>> >
>> > enum {
>> >+ MWL8361P = 0,
>> > MWL8363 = 0,
>> > MWL8687,
>> > MWL8366,
>>
>> I'm not an expert, but isn't this giving both 8361P and 8363 the
>> same values in the enum?
>
> Yeah, this is broken.
Before this email, Helmut pointed me to the enum thingie in a private query.
As I was busy with OverlayFS the last days, I couldn't give that
information back.
So, this should be:
...
enum {
MWL8361P = 0,
MWL8363,
MWL8687,
MWL8366,
...
Shall I cook up a new patch with a proper history and documented
origin (original patch is from OpenWrt, I refreshed it against
upstream)?
...add some Tested-by (Helmut, Jim)...
...send that to linux-wireless ML for a review?
- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[M2M Wireless]