Johannes Berg wrote:
> Technically, but that would be assuming it's implemented everywhere ...
> if it was tested by the WFA we'd implement it :-)
Heh :)
> Also, in order to actually implement it in AP mode we need to use the
> "RC update only".
>
> I think it makes more sense to unify the handling here -- change rate
> control (and also tell the driver, like one of my patches did) rather
> than treating 20/40 changes in managed mode differently than in AP mode.
Agreed.
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[M2M Wireless]