Hello, guys.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:34:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Why not use 'base' below? neither unit nor base change.
>
> Yes it's a bit strange, it was the same in Tejun's patch.
> Tejun, any idea?
It was years ago, so I don't recall much. I think I wanted to use a
variable name which signifies its role - I worked out the rather
convoluted base number logic on paper first and I probably wanted to
keep the distinctions. I don't think it really matters at this point
tho. Just make sure those functions are marked deprecated so that no
one else copies them.
Thanks.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
[KVM Development]
[CentOS Virtualization]
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite Forum]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Find Someone Nice]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]