On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:26:06AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:53:52PM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> > The current virtblk's naming algorithm only supports 263 disks.
> > If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 263), there will be disks
> > with the same name.
> >
> > By renaming "sd_format_disk_name()" to "disk_name_format()"
> > and moving it into block core, virtio_blk can use this function to
> > support mass of disks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I guess it's already way too late but why couldn't they have been
> named vdD-P where both D and P are integers denoting disk number and
So, if a device name ends in digit the partition code adds delimiter
'p' automatically and this is already in use by md. So, partitioned
md devices are named mdDpP where D and P are base 10 number indicating
the sequence like md12p4. So, let's please add comment that new
drivers should name their devices PREFIX%d where the sequence number
can be allocated by ida.
Thanks.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
[KVM Development]
[CentOS Virtualization]
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite Forum]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Find Someone Nice]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]