On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:58:21 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:54:43PM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The current virtblk's naming algorithm just supports 26^3
> > disks. If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 26^3), there
> > will be disks with the same name.
> >
> > According to "sd_format_disk_name()", I add function
> > "virtblk_name_format()" for virtblk to support mass of
> > disks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Nod. This is basically what 3e1a7ff8a0a7b948f2684930166954f9e8e776fe
> did. Except, maybe we should move this function into block core
> instead of duplicating it? Where would be a good place to put it?
> Jens, care to comment?
Indeed.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
How could I marry someone with more hair than me? http://baldalex.org
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
[KVM Development]
[CentOS Virtualization]
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite Forum]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Find Someone Nice]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]