On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:11:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:09:38 -0500
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > Did you test this patch with a large amount of minors?
> > >
> > > Sorry I didn't do runtime test.
> >
> > Please do.
>
> The poor guy probably doesn't know how to test it and surely it would
> be quite a lot of work for him to do so.
>
> Overall, it would be much more efficient if the tester of this code is
> someone who is set up to easily apply the patch and test it. ie: the
> code maintainer(s).
<grins>
This patch aside - Andrew how do you deal with a large amount of patches
and make sure they are tested? Is there a weekly Test Tuesday where you
kick off your automated tests and dilligently look for any variations?
Or is it more of compile the kernel with X features and run it for a week
doing normal (and abnormal!) things to see if it falls over?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
[KVM Development]
[CentOS Virtualization]
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite Forum]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Find Someone Nice]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]