Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] virtio_net: Split receive buffer alloc/add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:41:01 -0800, Mike Waychison <mikew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In preparation for allocating receive buffers in the slow path without
>> disabling NAPI, split the allocation and addition of receive buffers
>> apart into two separate functions (per receive buffer type).
>> While here, move the vi->num accounting into the add functions.
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Waychison <mikew@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi Mike...
>        This exposes a nasty ugliness in the way virtio_net works.  We
> allocate an skbuff for the small packet case, and just allocate the
> pages for the large packet cases, and alloc the skbuff when we fill the
> pages.
>        I think all the allocators should return a populated skbuff;
> this uses a bit more memory in theory, but should make the code simpler.
> As an added bonus, your life should get much simpler for these patches.
> I'll try to create such a patch tonight, but I'm busy finalizing my
> presentation, so it might take longer :(

This seems reasonable for the "big" receive buffers, but I don't think
it makes a lot of sense for "mergeable" receive buffers as best I can
tell.  Hopefully making this work isn't too hard though :)
Virtualization mailing list

[KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Find Someone Nice]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux Resources]
Add to Google Powered by Linux