Re: RFC: Attaching threads to cgroups is OK? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:12:47 +0900 (JST) Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - I think this kind of thread application should control its I/O requests > inside of the application. I guess it seems to quite difficult to > determine which thread is doing what kind of job in the application. > We can just leave this issue to these type of applications, can we? > I guess most of this kind of applications must have been well designed > already. > I agree. (it's better to postpone this.) But maybe cpuset (HPC) applications uses per-thread cgroup attachment. So, I can't say there is no trouble even if we ignore threads. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
[Site Home] [KVM Development] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]