Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] usb: otg: support for multiple transceivers by a single controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:41:54PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:18:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > 
> > > Maybe... but that'll, again, mean loads of per-board data to associate
> > > both devices. If everybody was using DT, we could just use phandles :-p
> > > 
> > > Then again, when we want to have a kernel-wide generic PHY layer (not
> > > USB PHY layer, but generic), we will have waaaaay too much data to
> > > associate PHYs with their specific Links.
> > 
> > Just like you said just now, there are much things to do for PHY Layer (or
> > kernel-side generic PHY), so we need step by step. Does you agree we move
> > USB PHY related things to drivers/usb/phy first?
> Sure, that makes sense. But what will drivers/usb/otg become ? Wouldn't
> it be better to just rename that directory instead ? That's holding PHY
> drivers anyway.
drivers/usb/otg will be only for otg driver, like current xxx_otg.c, and
command otg file in future.

As we have decided to separate PHY from OTG, it is better to put two things
at two different folders.
> -- 
> balbi


Best Regards,
Peter Chen

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

B and H Foto and Electronics Corp.

[Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]     [More Archives]

Add to Google Powered by Linux