Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] usb: otg: support for multiple transceivers by a single controller

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:41:54PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:18:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:28:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe... but that'll, again, mean loads of per-board data to associate
> > both devices. If everybody was using DT, we could just use phandles :-p
> > 
> > Then again, when we want to have a kernel-wide generic PHY layer (not
> > USB PHY layer, but generic), we will have waaaaay too much data to
> > associate PHYs with their specific Links.
> 
> Just like you said just now, there are much things to do for PHY Layer (or
> kernel-side generic PHY), so we need step by step. Does you agree we move
> USB PHY related things to drivers/usb/phy first?

Sure, that makes sense. But what will drivers/usb/otg become ? Wouldn't
it be better to just rename that directory instead ? That's holding PHY
drivers anyway.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature