Re: drivers/net/usb/hso.c on sparc32

[Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> is fast enough to be a really good maintainer I just about
> manage to get a linux release candidate about every 10-12 days.
> I want to be a primary contributor to hso.c but the internal version I maintain
> is not whats in the official tree also as much as I love git I'm a bit of a clown with it, I
> keep making mistakes with it, I've succeeding in corrupting clearcase 
> repositorys in the past but clearcase is rubbish compared to git, I love git.

You might find tools like quilt/stgit are actually more useful for
maintaining patches on top of a git tree. I certainly do as they are much
more flexible.

> > It's been a usb thing, so linux-usb is good.

Can we agree which tree hso is going via. I've got stuff in ttydev for it
which at the moment does depend on the ttydev tree queue but after that
it would be nice to have a definitive correct tree - which I think is
linux-usb in this case ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html