On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Justin Clacherty wrote:
> Justin Clacherty wrote:
> > Alan Stern wrote:
> >> You might want to generalize this. There's nothing special about the
> >> Ethernet gadget; other sorts might need high power too.
> >>
> >> And there's no reason to make it a boolean. You might as well have
> >> people specify the actual maximum mA value here, so that the drivers
> >> can incorporate the number (divided by 2!) directly into their
> >> descriptors.
> >>
> >
> > Is this better?
>
> Actually, the range of the value should be constrained. Here we go.
This looks reasonable to me. The only question is whether it really
needs to be a controllable option or whether it should be customized
per-system. That's a matter of taste, up to David.
Alan Stern
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
[Home]
[Video for Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Video Projectors]
[PDAs]
[Hacking TiVo]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Devices]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Free Dating]