On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Phil Endecott wrote: > This trivial documentation patch corrects a comment in usbdevice_fs.h; it > previously suggested that the signal would only be sent on error, but I am > told that it is sent on both successful and unsuccessful completion. > > Signed-off-by: "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_usb_devel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- linux/include/linux/usbdevice_fs.h.orig 2007-10-29 19:28:56.000000000 +0000 > +++ linux/include/linux/usbdevice_fs.h 2007-10-29 19:33:27.000000000 +0000 > @@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ struct usbdevfs_urb { > int start_frame; > int number_of_packets; > int error_count; > - unsigned int signr; /* signal to be sent on error, -1 if none should be sent */ > + unsigned int signr; /* signal to be sent on completion, > + -1 if none should be sent. */ Good except for the fact that signr is 0 to indicate no signal should be sent. I guess that's another error in the comment. How can an unsigned int be equal to -1 anyway? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel