Re: trace_printk() support in trace-cmd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 11/23/2010 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/16/2010 05:12 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Hmm, I'll try it out on the latest kernel. Would you be able to upload > the trace.dat that does not work someplace that I can get it. I'd like > to take a look at it. If you don't have a place to put it, I could give
>  you access to my box, and you can scp it there.

Hmm, I still can not reproduce. But as a workaround, here's what you can
do for now. Instead of using trace_printk() use:

    __trace_printk(_THIS_IP_, "format", args);

This will force the snprintf into the buffer and skips the bprintk trick
to post process at read time.

I see a trace_printk() commit in trace-cmd.git. Is that related? If not, I'll work on getting a small sample of the problem.


error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux