Re: [PATCH] tracing, perf: add more power related events

[Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  On 9/22/2010 8:31 AM, Jean Pihet wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a patch that redefines the power events API. The advantages
>> are: easier maintainance of the kernel and the
>> user space tools, a cleaner and more generic interface, more
>> parameters for fine tracing and even documentation!
>>
>> Thomas, this patch has your patch above merged in ('power-trace: Use
>> power_switch_state instead of power_start and power_end'). The revised
>> ACPI patch is coming asap.
>>
>> The trace points for x86 and OMAP are also udated accordingly.
>>
>> The pytimechart tool needs an update for the new API. This can be done
>> as soon as the kernel code gets merged in.
>
> unfortunately this code is changing a userspace ABI... we really shouldn't
> do that if we can avoid it,
> and here we can avoid it.
>
> applications ARE using this stuff!
What are the apps that are using it? I know about builtin-timechart,
pytimechart. Is powertop using this as well?

Is it better to go for a 3 steps approach (add new API, change tools,
deprecate old API) like proposed above?

Thanks,
Jean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html