On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:08 -0700, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > + if (val & BIT_64(62)) {
> > + val &= ~BIT_64(62);
> > + wrmsrl(msrs[i], val);
> > }
>
> Wouldn't it be much better to name those things, BIT(62), BIT(18) etc.
> aren't very descriptive at all.
>
> MCE_MISC_COUNTER_PRESENT is much more descriptive than BIT(62).
I know but I have the exact bit name from the BKDG in the comment above
- CntP - and this is used only at one place - here - so no need for the
defines, IMHO.
But yeah, I see your point too.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]