Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: tegra: Add PCIe device tree support |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: tegra: Add PCIe device tree support
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:02:18 -0600
- Cc: linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>, devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>, Mitch Bradley <wmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20120801063545.GA26791@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
On 08/01/2012 12:35 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:18:15AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> This patch series adds support for device tree based probing of
>>> the PCIe controller found on Tegra SoCs.
>>
>> Thierry,
>>
>> I think one thing that would help here would be to split up this
>> series into one per subsystem, and to get all the dependencies
>> merged by the respective maintainers. Preferably, each subsystem
>> would export a stable branch (perhaps consisting of just these
>> patches) that I can then merge into the Tegra tree and use as a
>> basis for the PCIe driver itself. Hopefully this approach will
>> get more traction on all the non-Tegra changes. Does that sound
>> like a good plan?
>
> I don't understand. The series is already split up into
> per-subsystem patches. I just didn't want to post them separately
> so everybody on Cc would be able to see the big picture and the
> reason why the patch was required.
There are separate patches that touch the different subsystems, but
they're all scattered throughout the one series, rather than having e.g.:
* a series for the PCI tree
* a series for the ARM core tree
* a series for the OF/DT tree
* a series for the Tegra tree, which indicates it depends on all of those.
I'm wondering if the reason you haven't seen much discussion/Acks from
the maintainers of the non-Tegra trees is because this is a big scary
series that touches a lot of stuff, and it's not necessarily clear for
people unfamiliar with it why they're being CCd on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ARM Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]