Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: tegra: Add AHB driver |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: tegra: Add AHB driver
- From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:14:09 +0300
- Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "balbi@xxxxxx" <balbi@xxxxxx>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4F981F6C.2050807@wwwdotorg.org>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:59:40PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 06:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 April 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> ...
> >>> Can this driver be located under "drivers/misc"? Or is there any better place?
> >>
> >> maybe drivers/platform/arm/ ??
> >
> > I really wouldn't want to add that directory: It has the risk of letting
> > people add random crap there that may or may not be related to ARM (the
> > company) and/or ARM (the architecture).
> >
> > I think it could go into drivers/amba/ along with the primecell bus driver.
> > The two drivers are for two different aspects of the AMBA spec and don't
> > actually depend on one another as far as I can tell, but it's at least
> > a fitting name, and it doesn't depend on the ARM architecture, which is
> > important because the driver could be used on other architectures that
> > are connected to an AHB bus.
>
> Hiroshi, is this driver for something (registers/features) that AMBA
> actually specifies? AHB might be part of AMBA (I'm not familiar enough
> to know), but I don't think this aspect of Tegra's AHB bus is part of
> any core AHB/AMBA specification, rather than being some Tegra-specific
> control over the bus (given that the registers and bits correspond to
> Tegra-specific devices on the bus).
>
The HW controlled by this 'driver' is roughly: the AHB arbiter, glue logic
between IP blocks and the AHB bus and AHB memory controller slave. All of
these are tegra specific AFAIK. So I don't see much point in a generic
driver.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ARM Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]